Burning the Books and their Authors

Josie Holford

View Comments

  • Thank you for this very interesting post. I strongly support JKRowling and cannot imagine why anyone would not do so.
    Gwen.

    • The reason some do not support JKR is because:
      1. They have not read what she has written (on the so-called controversial issue) or
      2. They have read it and it makes them blind with rage that she is so reasonable and caring but uncaptured by the ideology. She defends boundaries - women's rights and the safeguarding of children. She is a defender of all human rights.

      Interesting too, that while there are other prominent critical thinkers - Ricky Gervaise as one example - none of them get the hatred, threats and abuse that JKR routinely receives.

      This is a virulently misogynist and homophobic movement with a regressive ideology founded on sexist stereotypes about men and women. They are lost in the fantasy of being the most victimized in history. Look at how Eddie Izzard in a successful millionaire male in "boy" mode. In what he calls "girl" mode (lipstick and heels) he is transformed into a victim. Being a woman is not a costume and Izzard is not a victim of anything other than of his narcissism and fetish.

  • My favorite was a book on babies that my mother left on a shelf we could all reach. No need to say more. Of course we were surrounded by dogs and cats doing their doggy and cat stuff resulting in puppies and kittens. And our mothers kept having babies in the 1950's too. I do remember my parents sneaking off to watch a film "The Lovers" which had been condemned and was now available. Maybe they wanted some new ideas!

  • I remember finding a copy of the Decameron at home, possibly hidden in the same drawer as Lady Chatterly. It was wrapped in a paper towel and Dad my have taken it to read at work. The racier bits had been translated into French; maybe that was why I tried harder than you to learn French! LOL

    • Now I come to think of it “Lady C” was also wrapped in paper towel. I can see it now – the cupboard in the kitchen in Norfolk Close, the ribbed paper. Possibly that is where I found the “Decameron” too, although I don’t remember.

      And then – in plain sight, on the bookshelf behind the sliding glass door – the Pelican edition of “The Satyricon” by Petronius. This was another book deemed blasphemous, rude, and obscene. (I tried it a few times and found it very boring. Just ancient Romans behaving badly. Well, why would you expect anything different?)

      But seriously Chris … what were our parents thinking in potentially exposing our young minds to such filth? And – more importantly – why was our very frugal mother wasting money on paper towels?

Recent Posts

Columbia, Cats, Cass, and a Spring Stickybeak

Before decamping to Brooklyn for the month I saw this on a utility box on…

1 day ago

The Affair of the Chocolate Teapot

Midge Hazelbrow, the indomitable co-head of Wayward St. Etheldreda's Academy, took herself for a brisk…

2 months ago

Best Practices, Reading Wars, and Eruption at Wayward

Before the eruption, it was a typical senior leadership meeting at Wayward. Head of School,…

2 months ago

Words Matter

When I taught fourth and fifth grade at a school that didn't assign grades, the…

2 months ago

The Culinary Capers and Comic Catastrophes of Gerald Samper

It was the Gert Loveday review of Rancid Pansies (it’s an anagram) that set me…

2 months ago

Working and Not Working

A post on LinkedIn caught my attention this week.  It's had over 11,000 views so…

3 months ago